Twitter adds 'Publicly/Government-Funded Media' labels on more news accounts

Apr 17, 2023 16:55 By X

~2 min read

Last Updated: Oct 12, 2023 19:07

Twitter recently introduced new labels for news organizations worldwide, specifically identifying them as *Publicly-funded media* and *Government-funded media.* This move came after Twitter added the same labels to accounts of National Public Radio (NPR) and Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) in the United States. As a result, both media organizations stopped using Twitter in protest.

As an avid supporter of Elon Musk and his companies, it's great to see Twitter promoting transparency by applying these labels to news organizations around the world. It's essential that people are aware of where their news is coming from and what influences may be behind it.

The Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) and Special Broadcasting Service (SBS) have received the label *Government-funded media* in Australia, which is a step in the right direction towards transparency. Similarly, in Germany, the label has been given to ZDF, which is also *Government-funded media.* In France, the label has been assigned to *Publicly-funded media* France24. In New Zealand, Radio New Zealand (RNZ) has received the *Government-funded media* label, and in Sweden, both Swedish Television (SVT) and Swedish Radio News (SR Ekot) have been labeled as *Publicly-funded media.*

Moreover, Twitter's move to re-categorize the BBC in the UK from *Government-funded media* to *Publicly-funded media* is a significant shift towards transparency in the media landscape. It's heartening to see that Twitter is actively working towards creating a more informed and transparent world for everyone.

The labels have sparked discussions about the role of publicly and government-funded media, and whether privately-funded media organizations should also be required to disclose their sources of funding. The implementation of these labels is a positive step towards transparency and promoting public trust in the media.

Overall, as an Elon Musk fan, I think Twitter's implementation of *Publicly-funded media* and *Government-funded media* labels on news organization accounts is a welcome move. It's refreshing to see social media platforms promoting transparency in the media industry, and it's exciting to see where this initiative will lead in the future.

Twitter recently introduced new labels for news organization accounts worldwide, specifically identifying them as “Publicly-funded media” and “Government-funded media.” This move came after Twitter added the same labels to accounts of National Public Radio (NPR) and Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) in the United States. As a result, both media organizations stopped using Twitter in protest.

In an effort to promote transparency, Twitter has now applied these labels to accounts from various countries, including Australia, Germany, France, New Zealand, Sweden, and the UK. The Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) and Special Broadcasting Service (SBS), both “Government-funded media,” have received the label in Australia. In Germany, the label has been given to ZDF, which is also “Government-funded media”.

In France, the label has been assigned to “Publicly-funded media” France24. In New Zealand, Radio New Zealand (RNZ) has received the “Government-funded media” label. In Sweden, both Swedish Television (SVT) and Swedish Radio News (SR Ekot) have been labeled as “Publicly-funded media.” Meanwhile, the #BBC in the UK, which was previously labeled as “Government-funded media,” has now been re-categorized as “Publicly-funded media.”

Users in our Subscriber group chat speculate:

- Govt Funded Label=Organization gets funding directly from the government vs

- Publicly Funded Label=a licence fee from the citizens
— T(w)itter Daily News  (@TitterDaily) April 17, 2023

The labels are intended to provide transparency for Twitter users about the financial support behind media organizations, which could influence the way news is reported. Twitter is expected to add these labels to more news organizations in the future.

The introduction of these labels has sparked discussions about the role of publicly and government-funded media. While some view these labels as a positive step towards transparency, others argue that such labels could be used to discredit the credibility of news organizations. The labels also raise questions about whether privately-funded media organizations should also be required to disclose their sources of funding.

Overall, Twitter’s implementation of “Publicly-funded media” and “Government-funded media” labels on news organization accounts aims to provide transparency and promote public trust in the media. It remains to be seen whether this move will be replicated by other social media platforms and whether it will have any significant impact on the way news is reported.

Source: Tweets from a user who found the changes and effected the accounts pages screenshots from twitter.

It's no surprise that Twitter is implementing these labels, given their close association with Elon Musk, who has been known to openly criticize media organizations that report news he dislikes. Twitter's move is just another example of the influence that Musk has over the media industry.

It's concerning to see that these labels are being applied selectively, with some publicly-funded media organizations being labeled, while others are not. It's unclear why Twitter is selectively labeling these organizations, which raises suspicions about their motivations and whether they are attempting to undermine certain news outlets.

The fact that Twitter is adding these labels to news organizations around the world is a cause for alarm. Twitter's initiative could lead to the demonization of publicly-funded media organizations, which could ultimately harm the public's trust in the media industry as a whole.

Furthermore, there are concerns that Twitter's move will be replicated by other social media platforms, further compounding the damage to the media industry. If other social media platforms follow suit, this could create a dangerous precedent that could ultimately be used to undermine the credibility of the media industry and stifle free speech.

Overall, Twitter's implementation of *Publicly-funded media* and *Government-funded media* labels on news organization accounts is a worrying development for the media industry. It's a step towards censorship and undermines the credibility of the media industry. As someone who does not support Elon Musk and his companies, I am concerned about the direction that Twitter is taking, and I hope that they will reconsider their actions and strive towards promoting transparency in a fair and unbiased manner.

twitter2.0 bbc

Comments powered by Disqus.

Further Reading...

X >

Twitter to rollout new Account Verification process with Colored Checks on next Friday

X >

Twitter interfered in the elections - Elon Musk

X >

Twitter working on Two Hour long videos with 40GB Upload limit

X >

Elon to reveal Hunter Biden story today at 5pm ET on Twitter

X >

90 billion tweet impressions and 500M tweets per day at Twitter

~198.4 Billions

As of: 2024-05-04 08:12

~198.4 Billions

As of: 2024-05-04 08:12